VGLNT logo
For CTOs

Compliance shouldn't delay your next release

Every audit cycle, senior engineers get pulled away from roadmap work to export configurations, gather evidence, and chase screenshots.

VGLNT automates that work across the tools you already use, so engineering stays focused on shipping.

RUN THE NUMBERS

How much engineering time do audits actually consume?

Collecting evidence takes multiple hours per system per cycle. Multiply that across your systems and see how much time you’d save.

25

Cloud accounts, clusters, databases, SaaS tools of record.

1 h

Pulling evidence, formatting it, answering follow-up questions.

4

Internal reviews, external audits, customer assessments.

€85
70%

How much of the evidence comes straight from source systems.

Engineering time spent on evidence today
100 h / year
€8,500 per year
RETURNED TO YOUR TEAMS
70 h
€5,950 per year · about 2 engineer-weeks

An estimate based on your own inputs. It counts only direct hours — the interrupt cost of pulling engineers out of focused work is on top.

Advantages

What changes for your teams

Engineers stop acting as the audit service desk

Exports, screenshots and configuration dumps are collected from the systems themselves. The requests that used to land in your team's queue never get created.

Interruptions, gone

The expensive part of a compliance cycle is the context switching it forces. Scheduled collection runs in the background and asks nothing of the people building your product.

Scale compliance without scaling manual work

A new cloud account, cluster or SaaS tool is onboarded once as a source. Its evidence then flows into every control and framework that needs it.

Reuse evidence across multiple regulatory frameworks

The same access data serves every framework you're measured against: DORA, ISO 27001, NIS2, and whatever comes next. Your teams answer once, not once per regulation.

An example

Access reviews without pulling platform engineers into admin work

Quarterly review of privileged access across cloud and identity systems. On paper it belongs to compliance. In practice it lands on your platform engineers four times a year.

  1. 01The old shape of the request

    A ticket asks for the current IAM role assignments per account, the Okta admin groups, and proof that last quarter's removals happened. Two engineers spend a day and a half producing exports and reformatting them.

  2. 02What replaces it

    VGLNT holds a read-only, least-privilege connection to AWS and Okta. The same data is pulled on schedule, in a consistent shape, without a ticket.

  3. 03Follow-up questions answer themselves

    "Was this account removed?" and "when did this role change?" are answered from evidence history rather than by another engineer digging through logs.

  4. 04Engineers are involved only where judgement is needed

    Your team is asked one question: is this service account still legitimate? That is a two-minute answer, and it is the only part that actually required them.

Across dozens of systems and several cycles a year, that difference is not a rounding error in your capacity plan — it is weeks of senior engineering time.

Frequently asked questions

Compliance shouldn't delay your next release. Book a short call and see how you get your engineering hours back.

Book a call